Big Bertha Thing gyro Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gyro.html Access page JPG 12K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.war.nuclear Drawing of an ordinary gyroscope. Caption:- Fig. XVI Extract from the Introductory Chapter:- But the most interesting top of all is undoubtedly the ordinary gyroscope. That depicted in Fig. XVI........ although merely sold as a toy, is nevertheless capable of illustrating the gyroscopic phenomena which have been so much made use of in modern mechanical invention. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing rita Educating Rita This film portrays a dominant spouse and a long-suffering student, to the extent upto and including divorce, book-burning and forced pregnancy. There was zero privacy. Any attempt to re-register or change the password would not work, because the secret could not be kept. Every posting by the spouse is a violation of OU rules and the students education, causing real pain. Vetting by one moderator or by several using a non-public Rita conf. would not work, because the spouse would use the students name, with all the further alienation that would cause. A new policy needs to be adopted. The last resort punishment measure, needs to be the first resort measure on compassionate grounds; that of making the student read-only on FC. The student would thank you for it, but not publically. It would need to be agreed between ACS and OUSA, which is what they are there for. Tony Lance This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it From: Tony Lance < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:58:31 +0000 Tuesday, November 18, 1997 10:04:23 PM Message From:   Tony Lance Subject:        Big Bertha Thing 1 To:     FC Mods Discussion From Bibliography of Pastures.(Optional) The preface from An Elementary Treatment of Gyroscopes and Similar Spinning Tops by Crabtree 1909 Classic Cartoon and animated cartoon of Animal Farm by George Orwell NB (2006) Stateside, all investment funding for super-colliders is at ground zero; past, present and future. Politics makes poor science.

Lester Zick < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote in message                                   The Definition of Points                                                 ~v~~ In the swansong of modern math lines are composed of points. But then we must ask how points are defined? However I seem to recollect intersections of lines determine points. But if so then we are left to consider the rather peculiar proposition that lines are composed of the intersection of lines. Now I don't claim the foregoing definitions are circular. Only that the ratio of definitional logic to conclusions is a transcendental somewhere in the neighborhood of 3.14159 . . . ~v~~ Can you prove that non-circular definition of existence exists? Well that depends on what you and others mean by existence exists . On the face of it the phrase existence exists is itself circular and no more demonstrable than a phrase like pointing points . It's just a phrase taken as a root axiomatic assumption of truth by Ayn Rand in my own personal experience whether others have used it or not I don't know. On the other hand if you're asking whether anything exists and is capable of being unambiguously defined the answer is yes. I've done exactly that on more than one occasion first in the root post to the thread Epistemology 201: The Science of Science of two years ago and more recently in the root post to the thread Epistemology 401: Tautological Mechanics from a month ago. The technique of unambiguous definition and the definition of truth is simply to show that all possible alternative are false. Empirics and mathematikers generally prefer to _base_ their definitions on undemonstrable axiomatic assumptions of truth whereas I prefer to _base_ definitions of truth on finite mechanical tautological reduction to self contradictory alternatives. The former technique is a practice in mystical insight while the latter entails exhaustive analysis and reduction in purely mechanical terms. ~v~~

If you have a definition of definition you can't prove that it is a really stuff becouse you don't know what definition is before you defined it. I can as well say that definition is a big red apple and it is true by definition. You can't prove that definition is not a big red apple becouse you don't have definition of definition other then this. Since I defined definition first, from now on definition is big red apple ))) Well you might just as well stop congratulating yourself quite so heartily and learn to spell instead. You don't need to know what definition is before you define it. All you need to show is that the definition for definition fulfills its own definition. ~v~~

This is usually stated as an axiom. And it does not define points nor lines. Of course it's usually stated as an axiom because the rationalization itself doesn't support the conclusion and in fact has nothing to do with the conclusion. You might just as well say that this point is unique because the sun is round . But you're wrong if you think this doesn't define this point because it's the association of predicates that matters whether the association is axiomatic assumption or not. ~v~~

I think it's time to call Determinator ))) He is the only one who can help us! hahahahahahaha ~v~~

A point has no parts, each part of continuum has parts, therefore continuum cannot be resolved into any finite amount of points. Real numbers must be understood like fictions. All this seems to be well-known. When will the battle between frogs and mices end with a return to Salviati? ~v~~- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ~v~~