Big and proud return to the classics, shapely, feminine lines of head-dresses or Afro it is the alternative not only on the carnival. In this season we observe return to the classics. Very strong lines of hair-cuttings, geometrical, sharp cuts - that's dominating. The classics does not mean however the boredom, oldschool quiet, classical forms broken they are futuristic asymmetries. A base of neat, feminine head-dresses is the sharp cut showing the face and neck, asymmetric, simple fringes exhibiting the face.
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
|
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
Perhaps you should hope for the return of Glorb... LOL Perhaps you ought to pay a visit to the Wizard of Oz and ask for the same thing the Scarecrow wanted. In the meantime, read this chart and weep: http://www.systemshootouts.org/?q=3Dnode/198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
Impressive!! http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8614 Apple's global market share is only 3.3 percent among the 69.5 million PC shipped in the March quarter, according to IDC. But that market share tally is up from 2.5 percent in the March quarter a year ago. Why do those Apple gains matter? Those Mac sales most likely came at the expense of a new Windows machine. BTW, what is the whole subject of that post? Microsoft¹s elephant in the OS room: Apple The whole thing is about how the Mac is making an impact into Microsoft's market. 'TR¹s audience is comprised of the folks that actually implement stuff. It¹s not the fanboy crowd. One sample response from an IT exec: I started out as a Windows/Novell man, but now I advocate for Mac purchases and make them as much as I can. Two main reasons I do this: 1) on the whole, they require less time to support, much less time, actually, because the OS runs better and there are fewer malware concerns; 2) I practice the philosophy of keeping it simple. Mac software is easy to use and, more importantly, easy to teach to my IT employees. ' http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/04/25results.html fiscal 2007 second quarter ended March 31, 2007 Apple shipped 1,517,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/07/25results.html 2007 third quarter ended June 30, 2007 Apple shipped 1,764,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/10/22results.html fiscal 2007 fourth quarter ended September 29, 2007 Apple shipped 2,164,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/01/22results.html fiscal 2008 first quarter ended December 29, 2007 Apple shipped 2,319,000 Macintosh® computers The above shows Apple shipped 7,764,000 Macs in calendar year 2007. http://gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=584210 Worldwide PC shipments totaled 271.2 million units in 2007 7,764,000/271,200,000 = .0286 Mac worldwide market share for 2007 = 2.86 % http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/04/23results.html fiscal 2008 second quarter ended March 29, 2008 Q2'08 Apple shipped 2,289,000 Macintosh® computers The above shows Apple shipped 2,289, Macs in the first calender quarter of 2008. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=648619 Worldwide PC shipments totaled 71.1 million units in the first quarter of 2008 2,289,000/71,100,000 = .0321 Mac worldwide market share for Q1'08 = 3.21% Mac gain in worldwide market share from 2007 to 2008 = .0321 - .0286 = 0.0035% or 0.35% Apple growth Q1'08: 51% Overall growth Q1'08: 12%. Somebody get Alan a math tutor! Mac Q1'08 / Mac Q1' 07 = 1.5088 Those figures were provided by you, above. Where did the other three quarters of 2007 go? Where did they need to go to compare the year of year growth of the Mac in one quarter to the year of year growth of the overall PC market in the same quarter? Then compare to the last quarter of 2007, not the first, asshat. Growth is from quarter to quarter. It doesn't leapfrog over three quarters of the year. Your Gartner reference to the overall figures is for first quarter to first quarter, so
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
[snipping lots of stuff to save bandwidth] First quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. See: they do this because sales of products fluctuate seasonally, so that comparing a quarter to the immediately preceding quarter isn't very useful. You found another Edwin, did you? ROTFLMAO!!! http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/04/25results.html fiscal 2007 second quarter ended March 31, 2007 Apple shipped 1,517,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503816 STAMFORD, Conn., April 18, 2007 Ð Worldwide PC shipments totaled 62.7 million units in the first quarter of 2007 1,517,000/62,700,000 = 0.0241 Mac worldwide market share Q1'07 = 2.41% http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/07/25results.html 2007 third quarter ended June 30, 2007 Apple shipped 1,764,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=509905 STAMFORD, Conn., July 18, 2007 Ð Worldwide PC shipments totaled 61.1 million units in the second quarter of 2007 1,764,000/61,100,000 = 0.0288 Mac worldwide market share Q2'07 = 2.88% http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/10/22results.html fiscal 2007 fourth quarter ended September 29, 2007 Apple shipped 2,164,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=532712 STAMFORD, Conn., October 17, 2007 Ð Worldwide PC shipments totaled 68.5 million units in the third quarter of 2007 2,164,000/68,500,000 = 0.0315 Mac worldwide market share Q3'07 = 3.15% http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/01/22results.html fiscal 2008 first quarter ended December 29, 2007 Apple shipped 2,319,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=584210 STAMFORD, Conn., January 16, 2008 Ð Worldwide PC shipments totaled 271.2 million units in 2007, a 13.4 percent increase from 2006, according to preliminary results by Gartner, Inc. The industry ended the year with fourth quarter PC shipments of 75.9 million units 2,319,000/75,900,000 = 0.0305 Mac worldwide market share Q4'07 = 3.05% http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/04/23results.html fiscal 2008 second quarter ended March 29, 2008 Q2'08 Apple shipped 2,289,000 Macintosh® computers http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=648619 STAMFORD, Conn., April 16, 2008 Ð Worldwide PC shipments totaled 71.1 million units in the first quarter of 2008 2,289,000/71,100,000 = 0.0321 Mac worldwide market share Q1'08 = 3.21% Summary: Mac worldwide market share Q1'07 = 2.41% Mac worldwide market share Q2'07 = 2.88% Mac worldwide market share Q3'07 = 3.15% Mac worldwide market share Q4'07 = 3.05% Mac worldwide market share Q1'08 = 3.21% Q1'07 compared to Q1'08 Mac gain in worldwide market share = 0.8% You're welcome, Alan! Of course you realize that, using your figures, Apple's market share has increased by 33%. Not buy using my figures. Apple is stuck at about 3% of the market, they're nowhere near 33% of the market. Now, try reading for content. Nowhere did I say that they were anywhere near 33% of the market. What I did say is that their market share increased by 33%, from 2.4 to 3.2%. IOW, it's stuck at about 3% of the market, just like it has been for at least the last ten years. But, as you have shown, and I have demonstrated, it is increasing. Do you deny that? Do I deny going from 3% to 3% is an increase? You bet your ass I do! Too bad for you that you said that it went from a 2.4 to a 3.2% market share, How is that bad for me? which, no matter how you try to spin it, is a 33% increase. For 1999, Apple ranked eighth in terms of worldwide PC shipments, with 3.4 percent, up from 3.3 percent the previous year. http://www.news.com/Apple-beats-expectations,-splits-stock/2100-1001_... 9.html At 3.2%, Apple hasn't even recovered its 3.4% level from 1999. How much of a decrease is it to go down from 3.4% to 3.2%, Dave? Snicker. Is that really what you wanted to say? Not in any shape or form. I prefer Apple's position in the market as opposed to your figure of Apple against itself. Would you mind writing that in English next time? Take a remedial reading course. I believe you should take an English Composition course, as your sentence is nonsensical. See what I mean? Yup, you seem to be English compositionally challenged... 8^) To a loon like you. BTW, why is it that your posts have a strange resemblance to those of Glorb, Mr. X, and Hasta la Vista? The truth is the truth no matter who posts it. You probably recognize all our posts as being the opposite of the bullsh*t you post. I have posted no BS, Glorb/Mr.X/err Hasta la Vista/err Edwin. You post nothing but B.S., idiot/moron/err sh*thead/err Dave. Having lost the argument, Edwin turns to insults. Same old Edwin... Same old Crazy Dave Fritzinger, acts like a moron, gets called a moron, and then declares victory. Same old Edwin. Having been proven to be wrong (using the figures he provided this time, no less) Edwin has nothing left but empty insults. Same old Crazy Dave Fritzinger, acting like a moron, then whining about being called a moron, then declaring victory for himself because he got what he deserved. I used your figures and showed you that the Mac marketshare has increased by 33%. Note, I didn't say it increased *to* 33%, but that the Mac market share increased *by* 33%. Do you understand the difference? From the blathering you have been doing, it is apparent that you do not. The truth has become blathering to Dave Moron Fritzinger. It is noted that Edwin is unable to refute what I wrote, so he is turning to insults, as usual Same old Edwin... Crazy Dave Fritzinger has gone to declaring victory and whining after acting like a moron and being told he's one after he did. No, Edwin. You declared victory for me, the minute you stopped responding to the substance of my posts, The substance of your posts is moronic claims. and started throwing out (lame) insults. IOW, I called a spade a spade. You lost the argument as soon as you started posting your usual stupid drivel. Apple's market share is stuck at 3%, no matter how you contrive a 33% gain. I showed the math, Edwin. I used your figures, and showed that the Mac market share increased by 33%. If you can't understand the math, perhaps you should take a remedial math course as well. Crazy Dave Fritzinger needs to show how going from 3% to 3% represents a 33% increase. Umm, no matter how you try to spin it, 2.4% doesn't get rounded up to 3%. Meaning that you are wrong, again. Umm, no matter how you try to spin it, going from 3.4% of the market to 3.2% of the market is not growth. For 1999, Apple ranked eighth in terms of worldwide PC ... wi?cej ť
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
|
your figures and showed you that the Mac marketshare has increased by 33%. Note, I didn't say it increased *to* 33%, but that the Mac market share increased *by* 33%. Do you understand the difference? From the blathering you have been doing, it is apparent that you do not. The truth has become blathering to Dave Moron Fritzinger. It is noted that Edwin is unable to refute what I wrote, so he is turning to insults, as usual Same old Edwin... Crazy Dave Fritzinger has gone to declaring victory and whining after acting like a moron and being told he's one after he did. No, Edwin. You declared victory for me, the minute you stopped responding to the substance of my posts,
... wi?cej ť
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
calendar fiscal year Apple Global market share
|
|
|
which, no matter how you try to spin it, is a 33% increase. For 1999, Apple ranked eighth in terms of worldwide PC shipments, with 3.4 percent, up from 3.3 percent the previous year. Okay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
