So that leaves 17 cameras. How many cameras do you NEED to FOCUS on bowlers hands and fielders who held the ball on the way to the bowler ? They don't. The point of the cameras is to cover the game, not the ball being tossed from fielder to fielder.

Phil. < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote in message So that leaves 17 cameras. How many cameras do you NEED to FOCUS on bowlers hands and fielders who held the ball on the way to the bowler ? Of those 17 there will be at least one at each end fixed to point straight down the pitch. There will also be focus on the bowler walking back to his mark, the batsman doing his bit of gardening, and - in England - one dedicated to looking for John Major, That still leaves quite a few, but there's still plenty of scope for fielders to do all sorts of things with the ball and not get caught. The guys who WON'T diddle the ball, actually, are the 'keeper and the bowler - they're too likely to get caught. I also recall that last time it came to the attention of a Pakistani team that camera men were out to catch them fiddling the ball there was a small stink.

I also recall that last time it came to the attention of a Pakistani team that camera men were out to catch them fiddling the ball there was a small stink. So what's the present scenario: do you think the camera men were told not to catch the Pakistanis - or to try very hard and catch them - or just do their normal action? Prakash

So that leaves 17 cameras. How many cameras do you NEED to FOCUS on bowlers hands and fielders who held the ball on the way to the bowler ? They don't. The point of the cameras is to cover the game, not the ball being tossed from fielder to fielder. 17 cameras are MORE THAN ENOUGH to watch the ball in bowlers hands and the fielders handling the ball on the way to the bowler.

That said, I remain entirely unconvinced by the assumption that for tampering to have occurred, it must have been picked up by the television cameras. The Cameras, all 27 of them, are unlikely to be trained on the ball. The bowler walking back, or a slip fielder maybe. But extra cover ? Of those cameras 4 are set up for run outs and 6 for Hawkeye, not such good odds when all those are taken out. Phil. So that leaves 17 cameras. How many cameras do you NEED to FOCUS on bowlers hands and fielders who held the ball on the way to the bowler ? when i fuc*K ur mom 5 cameras are on my huge COC*K and 2 camera on ur mom's boobs with good FOCUS You will NEVER DARE to meet me anywhere because you are a FUCKING TYPICAL AMERICAN PUSSY and you know it for a fact you won't live more than a minute after coming FACE to FACE with  me. Your PUSSY FACE is NOT EVEN WORTH for me to PISS on it.

17 cameras are MORE THAN ENOUGH to watch the ball in bowlers hands and the fielders handling the ball on the way to the bowler. Yes, but unless there are specific reasons to do so, they aren't going to do that.