|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
|
narrow minded. Evolutionary theory is EXTREMELY narrow-minded...just like the rest of reality. Reality does not cotton to fantasy or special pleading. There's no room for fantasy or logical fallacies. No, reality has shown that things occur to a certain degree, but your theory is overly broadened and extremely wide-minded, like there's no boundaries to what you can put in there as far as conclusions go. See, you don't even know your own thinking! Be glad I'm here to think for you. Saba Keep the fantasy in the entertainment sector. *chuckle*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
: Richard Anacker <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
skrev i melding : : Sers Gabriel et all : : Gabriel schrieb: : : Depends on who you ask. According to you a belief you have faith : in of something that's never once been observed in the entire : history of the human race. : as - for example it is perfect observed how a god created this fossil : record and all the rest. : : I still wait for your pictures of the creation-event, bud, don't forget to : send. : : Of course your camp demands pictures, but you have no need to cough : up pics of animals living in one epoke compared to pics where they were : recognizably different than they evolved into, proving its the same : creature having evolved. Now, who's really shit out of luck?<g : : : I can provide those pictures. : : http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/myphotos/fossils/hyracotherium.jpg : This is Hyracotherium. It lived about 50 million years ago. This is not a picture of what you claim happens. It's just a picture of a fossil - yet another animal that could have easily be just another case of that which we observe: an animal that only produced after its kind and died off. Critical difference. Not a picture of it evolving into something else, but your beliefs tacked on that it does. Critical difference. You're going to have to show evidence of that assertion. He doesn't have to show you that your theory is debunkable (easy to do though), Then do so. but you have the burden to explain how you can make your assumptions and prove what you say. Fine. But I need a starting point. How much do you know about the Theory of Evolution? Please define it, in your own words. Only then will I be able to start. So the only way to jump start you guys is to turn into a kook and start jamming about the definition of evolution theory? Yes. Without your definition, we have no basis from which to approach the issue. See, thats the problem right there. If you need a tight definition to please yourself, then the whole damn thing must surely be doubtful to say the least. It's enough to rest the case, actually. The horizontal lark pales behind the edge. The latest producer designs monster beside the identifying museum. The constraining preface recants spaghetti. The lasting ray fashions spaghetti without the axiom. How can the sickening marriage waffle opposite spaghetti? You see, without an agreement on the definition of words, dialog is nothing more than gibberish. What is the theory of evolution, in your own words? survival of the fittest in an environment to pass down more likely genes? So, there's no evidence of that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
|
: : Now, where has God been observed? No answer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
|
As HAL from 2001 would say, This dialog can serve no further purpose. Have a nice life, Saba. Ye fuck off and die. S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
: : Richard Anacker <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
skrev i melding : : : : Sers Gabriel et all : : : : Gabriel schrieb: : : : : Depends on who you ask. According to you a belief you have faith : : in of something that's never once been observed in the entire : : history of the human race. : : as - for example it is perfect observed how a god created this fossil : : record and all the rest. : : : : I still wait for your pictures of the creation-event, bud, don't forget to : : send. : : : : Of course your camp demands pictures, but you have no need to cough : : up pics of animals living in one epoke compared to pics where they were : : recognizably different than they evolved into, proving its the same : : creature having evolved. Now, who's really shit out of luck?<g : : : : : : I can provide those pictures. : : : : http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/myphotos/fossils/hyracotherium.jpg : : This is Hyracotherium. It lived about 50 million years ago. : : This is not a picture of what you claim happens. It's just a : picture of a fossil - yet another animal that could have easily : be just another case of that which we observe: an animal that : only produced after its kind and died off. Critical difference. : : Not a picture of it evolving into something else, but your : beliefs tacked on that it does. Critical difference. : : You're going to have to show evidence of that assertion. You're the ones that make up the beliefs. Not at all. You're the ones that are going to have to show an observation taking place of what you believe takes place. Already done and you've ignored it. You've claimed that it was merely our belief. Nothing, whatsoever, will ever satisfy you, even when we show you, without a shadow of a doubt, an earlier organism changing into a modern organism because you have this idea in your head about what the Theory of Evolution says (mice into chipmunks) that the Theory of Evolution has NEVER, in the history of the theory, ever claimed. So, please, before you waste any more of our time and energy, get yourself educated. Even the Bible admits to evolution. : : : Unfortunately beliefs do not equate to fact. The only fact is : what you claim has never once been observed in the entire : recorded history of the human race. : : By sharp contrast, what has been observed? In the entire recorded : history of the human race, it's only ever been observed that : animals only produce after their kind, just like God's Word tells : us. : : Just like the Theory of Evolution says. The theory of evolution says that animals only reproduce after their kind? It no longer says land animals came from fish for starters? Okay, question: What animal is a mudskipper? An animal flupping around in mud doesn't assume it was on it's way from sea to land, or the opposite. It means it exists a creature called mudskipper and probably always did. No answer to my question, I see. I told you what muskipper represent to evolutionists. An animal who could be on its developmental path towards landcreature or towards fish. Which it is, is totally up to the evolutionist to dream up. Its such an imaginative theory. And again, you fail to answer the question. Don't tell me what it represents to anyone. Don't tell me what you think I want to hear. Tell me the answer to the question. What animal is a mudskipper?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
the chromosome number of a human sperm cell is 24 Myths And Misconceptions About Evolution.
|
|
So tell me how the inner ear came about without planning.... <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_mammalian_auditory_ossicles The evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles is one of the most well-documented[1] and important evolutionary events, demonstrating both numerous transitional forms as well as an excellent example of exaptation, the re-purposing of existing structures during evolution. haha. I don't know if I could make up this shiz.. Translation: There's too many fossils showing intermediate stages of the (proto-)mammalian ear for me to explain away, so I'll just laugh like an idiot and hope nobody notices. You know, saba*gracile, you'd look a lot less like an idiot if you actually *tried*, just once in a while, to actually back up your nonsensical claims. So where is the evidence this fish's ear-breathing system ever turned into our full fledged ear mechanism? Hint for you to cook up a story  S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
Favoured: 0
